Purpose
To study diffraction and interference patterns produced with microwaves and to use the patterns to determine the wavelength of the microwaves.
Equipment
A. DETERMINE
0 FROM SINGLE-SLIT DIFFRACTION
PATTERN
Construct a single-slit using two of the metal plates on the magnetic holder
bar. Take several trial measurements of the "null" angle to determine a
suitable spacing of the slit. The slit must be wide enough that a minimum is
produced for
< 90; that is, only if
/a < 1, or a >
; however, if the slit width is too wide then the spacing between
minima will be too small to resolve.
Hints:
functions. When looking for a
maximum or minimum, don't be fooled by these artifacts which cause sudden
changes over a 1 or 2 angular range.
Once you have found a region of slit widths that give adequate measurements,
use the slit width and "null" angle results (at least three slit widths and as
many "null" angles as you can find) to determine a value (with uncertainty) for
the microwave wavelength
0.
Choose one slit width to take high resolution data of intensity as a function of angle (~ 2 increments on both sides). Be certain to extend your measurements out past the null angle (20 - 30 points should be sufficient). Plot I vs. , and "fit" your data to the functional form of eqn (2) using an appropriate fitting routine. A function such as the following:

seems to give reasonable results, where A, B, C, and D are the coefficients of
the fit. Once again (from the results of your fit) determine a value with
uncertainty for the wavelength
0.
B. DETERMINE
0 FROM THE DOUBLE-SLIT INTERFERENCE
PATTERN
Contruct a double-slit using two wide and one narrow metal plates on the
magnetic holder. Be careful to make the slits of equal width. The intensity
pattern that you observe is the superposition of the expected two slit
interference pattern and a diffraction pattern (as in part A) from each of the
two slits. Best results are obtained by choosing the slit widths a <
0 thereby guaranteeing (see eqn(3) ) that no diffraction
minima will occur at values of < 90. You can quickly verify that this
condition is met by covering one of the slits and checking that no zero
intensities can be found. However, there may still be a substantial reduction
in intensity (due to the diffraction pattern) at large angles. Thus, the
interference pattern will occur within the central peak of the diffraction
pattern, leading to lower intensities at large angles.
Measure the angular positions of as many maxima and minima as possible in the
two slit interference pattern. Use these results to determine a value (with
uncertainty) for the wavelength
0. Compare the values of
0 obtained by the two techniques (diffraction in part A, and
interference in part B) to the specified frequency of 10.525 GHz. Which method
gives the most precise measurement of
0 ?